U.S. Supreme Court News

Phoney Lawsuits: How a Polish immigrant apparently sued his way to $800K

By John O'Brien | Mar 16, 2017

FDS Bank says the man no longer qualifies for Social Security disability benefits because he has made approximately $800,000 from filing 31 lawsuits. FDS says he made less than $30,000 in 2009 working construction before creating a scheme to manufacture claims under the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

SCOTUS OKs discrimination lawsuits vs schools, even as administrative proceedings continue

By Chandra Lye | Mar 9, 2017

The U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled in favor of a disabled child’s parents in a dispute with the child’s school, saying the family was allowed to sue the school district over its decision to bar her from bringing her service dog to school. And while it could portend more lawsuits vs school districts, school districts shouldn't panic just yet.

Supreme Court delay leaves employers in the dark regarding class action waivers

By John Myers | Feb 22, 2017

The United States Supreme Court's decision to delay its review of the legality of mandatory class action waivers will mean more uncertainty for employers in the near future.

Trump appointments could reshape NLRB, but effects may not be felt for a few months

By Tabitha Fleming | Feb 8, 2017

With the White House now in the hands of Republicans, the majority on the National Labor Relations Board is also expected to soon change hands. But what impact that could have on the NLRB's proceedings and agenda, at least in the short term, remains to be seen. 

Anti-abortion plaintiffs get half a loaf, press for more in Chicago clinic "bubble zone" fight

By Christopher Knoll | Jan 17, 2017

Anti-abortion activists say they are pleased a federal judge has recognized what they called consistently biased treatment at the hands of Chicago Police enforcing the city's so-called abortion clinic "bubble zone" rules, but they said they intend to appeal the judge's findings that the ordinance is constitutional.

Supreme Court ruling throws Apple's $400M patent win into question, could impact other design patent litigation

By Taryn Phaneuf | Jan 12, 2017

In a unanimous decision last month, the U.S. Supreme Court took away Apple’s $400 million win in a lawsuit against Samsung, calling on the lower courts to reassess the damage award for violating a smartphone design patent.And this decision could have broader implications for other cases involving design patents for phones and other products, said a Chicago intellectual property attorney.

Ruling in Wisconsin redistricting lawsuit could provide pathway for reform in Illinois

By Taryn Phaneuf | Nov 23, 2016

A legal fight over the way legislative districts are drawn in Wisconsin could have implications for Illinois voters who have called for similar reform.

SCOTUS ruling may increase patent infringement lawsuits, settlements for fear of 'enhanced damages'

By Dawn Brotherton | Jun 28, 2016

A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision discarding strict standards for awarding enhanced damages in patent infringement cases could increase the number of patent cases filed in the U.S., a Chicago intellectual property attorney believes.

US Supreme Court refuses to revive overturned $10 billion tobacco verdict vs Philip Morris

By Ann Maher | Jun 20, 2016

The U.S. Supreme Court has denied review of an Illinois Supreme Court decision that cleared tobacco company Philip Morris of a $10 billion judgment. On June 20, the justices rejected a petition from plaintiff Sharon Price, who won the judgment in the court of former Madison County circuit judge Nicholas Byron in 2003. The Supreme Court had denied review of the same case in 2006, after the Illinois Supreme Court reversed Byron.

Challenge to Chicago affordable housing ordinance not affected by SCOTUS decision to not hear similar California case

By Katie Rucke | Mar 24, 2016

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision last month to not hear a California case challenging the constitutionality of an inclusionary housing ordinance should not have any impact on a similar lawsuit pending in Cook County.

Suburban flooding suit vs Metro Water Reclamation among six cases taken up by IL Supreme Court

By Jonathan Bilyk | Nov 30, 2015

The Illinois Supreme Court has agreed to take up the question of whether U.S. Supreme Court precedent or that of the state’s highest court should hold serve when deciding whether a decision by the Greater Chicago Water Reclamation District to release flood waters and damage private homes in the process constitutes an illegal taking of property. It was one of six cases the state high court agreed to take on appeal.

Temporary flooding caused by government action can be illegal taking of property, appellate panel rules

By Dan Churney | Aug 24, 2015

A state appellate panel has ruled the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion, and not that of the state’s highest court, should hold sway in a case in which a group of Chicago area homeowners have argued a decision by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago to release flood waters, resulting in backed-up sewers, flooded creeks and extensive damages to surrounding homes, constitutes an illegal taking of their property under the Illinois Constitution.

The Record Network