Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym
Uncategorized |
Uncategorized
Recent News About Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym
View More
-
HSPRD is proud to announce that Partner Liz Jaci has been officially welcomed as a member of The Society of Trial Lawyers!
-
Judges sided with Chicago electrical components maker in dispute with factory workers over claims they were shorted overtime pay
-
Black plaintiffs say Latino workers given work instead of them under company policies preferring Hispanic temp workers
-
After suffering initial setbacks, a group of Black people hoping to work as corrections officers succeeded in getting a federal judge to certify a class action accusing the Cook County Sheriff’s Office of discriminatory hiring practices.U.S.
-
Pangea, identified as Chicago's largest residential landlord, allegedly papers over problems at apartments, including mold, pest issues and large mechanical problems, according to the lawsuit
-
A federal judge says the plaintiffs can't show Madigan exerted "improper" influence on state lawmakers to pass new state laws beneficial to ComEd, so their racketeering case over ComEd's alleged bribes can't continue.
-
The legal team leading the class actions vs ComEd over the bribery scheme involving former House Speaker Michael Madigan are asking the judge to short out the utility's efforts to dismiss their lawsuits.
-
Ten female employees want to represent 1,800 women they say subjected to unacceptable detainee behavior, but appeals judges say their job responsibilities are too different to allow the case to continue as a class action.
-
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County against global industrial technology company Yaskawa Electric Corporation for allegedly violating the Illinois Wage Payment Collection Act (IWPCA) by deducting paid vacation hours from employees' last paychecks.
-
An Illinois appeals panel says the bankruptcy trustee for the estate of a woman who once worked for a suburban Chicago optometrist can press an insurance fraud lawsuit on behalf of the state of Illinois against that optometry practice, even if the alleged fraud had not cost the state any money.
