Cook County Record

Monday, March 30, 2020

Bar associations pan some IL Supreme Court campaigns; Epstein: Rating a result of 'inflexible rule' based on candidate legal experience

Campaigns & Elections

By Jonathan Bilyk | Mar 13, 2020

Law epstein daniel 1280
Daniel Epstein | Vimeo screenshot

Daniel Epstein, a candidate for the Illinois Supreme Court has pushed back, slightly, against the recommendations from certain attorney associations that voters should selected other candidates, because he is too inexperienced to sit on the state’s highest court.

However, the campaign for Illinois First District Appellate Justice Sheldon “Shelly” Harris has not responded to a request from the Cook County Record to comment on the Illinois State Bar Association’s decision to rate him as “not qualified.”

Epstein, an Evanston attorney, and Harris are among a crowded field seeking the Democratic Party’s nomination for a 10-year term on the Illinois Supreme Court, from the state’s First Judicial District. The district is limited to the borders of Cook County, so only Cook County voters will be allowed to vote in the race.


Illinois First District Appellate Court Sheldon A. "Shelly" Harris | harrisforjustice.com

Other candidates seeking the seat include:

  • P. Scott Neville, a former appellate court justice who has served on the state Supreme Court since 2018, when he was appointed to serve out the remainder of the term of retired Supreme Court Justice Charles E. Freeman, the state’s first African American Supreme Court justice;
  • Appellate Justice Cynthia Y. Cobbs;
  • Appellate Justice Jesse G. Reyes, who, if elected would become the state’s first Hispanic Supreme Court justice;
  • Appellate Justice Margaret Stanton McBride;
  • Appellate Justice Nathaniel R. Howse.
Neville, Cobbs and Howse are all African American.

This election cycle, a number of legal associations again evaluated and rated the candidates, ostensibly as a way to help voters decide who to support in the election.

The Chicago Bar Association, for instance, rated Neville, Reyes and McBride as “highly qualified.”

Harris, Cobbs and Howse were each rated “qualified.”

Epstein was rated “Not Recommended.”

Epstein’s rating was echoed by the Illinois State Bar Association.

In response, Epstein said the rating was expected. He noted the bar associations all operate under a “bright line rule,” established by the Alliance of Bar Associations for Judicial Screening.

Any judicial candidates with less than 10 years of legal experience are automatically rated “Not Recommended” for the bench, Epstein said.

“This is a reflection solely of that inflexible rule,” Epstein said. “It doesn’t reflect on my candidacy.”

Epstein has made his name in legal circles for his work, primarily through the firm of Jenner & Block, representing “people who have been wronged,” pro bono. At times, that work has taken him through to the U.S. Supreme Court.

His current campaign is based around fixing what he sees as “systemic problems” in Illinois’ legal system.

Among other issues, he is seeking to allow independent parties to decide if judges have conflicts of interest in hearing certain cases; to deploy sentencing guidelines to “fight bias in sentencing; to end cash bail for those charged with crimes; and to change the standard of evidence in Illinois courts, to the so-called Daubert standard, which he said would stop the courts from treating “pseudoscientists” as experts.

Epstein noted his relative lack of experience has not stopped him from receiving endorsements, including, among others, from labor unions, including Teamsters Local 777; progressive political organizations, like Planned Parenthood, Chicago NOW PAC and Our Revolution; civil rights lawyers, including Jon Loevy and Alexander Polikoff; law professors, including Illinois political corruption expert Dick Simpson; and the former general counsel for the Illinois State Bar Association, Tom Murphy.

“I believe we have done an excellent job of changing the terms of the debate in this race and in this state,” said Epstein.

ISBA also rated Neville, Reyes, McBride and Howse as “highly qualified.” It rated Cobbs as “qualified.”

Harris, however, was rated “not qualified,” noting concerns about his “demeanor” as a judge and on the bench.

Harris did not reply to questions submitted by the Cook County Record.

According to a report from Injustice Watch, Harris has spent more than $1.3 million on the race. He has put $1.95 million of his own money into the campaign, and has not indicated where that money came from.

Neville has received the endorsement of the Democratic Party in the contest.

Want to get notified whenever we write about any of these organizations ?

Sign-up Next time we write about any of these organizations, we'll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.

Organizations in this Story

Chicago Bar AssociationIllinois Supreme CourtIllinois State Bar Association

More News