In a recent class-action lawsuit, three plaintiffs have taken legal action against a major corporation over allegations of misleading marketing practices. Monica Castro, Damary Santa, and Nancy Helmold filed the complaint on January 14, 2025, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against Abbott Laboratories. The plaintiffs claim that Abbott's marketing of its "toddler drinks" is deceptive and misleads consumers into believing these products are necessary and beneficial for children aged 12 to 36 months.
The lawsuit centers around Abbott's "Go & Grow Toddler Drink by Similac" and "Pure Bliss Toddler Drink by Similac," which are marketed as nutritional supplements for toddlers. The plaintiffs argue that these products are not only unnecessary but potentially harmful due to their high sugar content. According to the complaint, these toddler drinks contain added sugars that are not recommended for children under two years old. The plaintiffs assert that Abbott's labeling practices falsely suggest that these drinks provide essential nutrients for growth and development, including claims of "immune support," "brain development," and "digestive health."
Monica Castro from California, Damary Santa from Massachusetts, and Nancy Helmold from Illinois purchased these products for their toddlers based on Abbott's marketing claims. They allege that they were misled into believing the drinks were nutritionally appropriate when they actually contain high levels of added sugars detrimental to children's health. The plaintiffs cite various studies indicating that excessive sugar intake can lead to long-term health issues such as obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases.
The plaintiffs seek restitution for themselves and others similarly affected across multiple states including California, Massachusetts, Illinois, Florida, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, and Washington. They demand corrective advertising measures from Abbott to prevent further consumer deception. Additionally, they request compensation for damages incurred due to purchasing these overpriced products under false pretenses.
Representing the plaintiffs are attorneys who specialize in consumer protection cases. The case is presided over by judges in the Northern District of Illinois under Case ID: 25-cv-377.