Quantcast

Bar Accuses Patron of Negligence After Gun Discharge Incident

COOK COUNTY RECORD

Friday, May 16, 2025

Bar Accuses Patron of Negligence After Gun Discharge Incident

State Court
Webp upddyosyayi11094xh132e7p3clg

Circuit Court Of Cook County | Official Website

The recent legal complaint filed by a prominent Chicago bar and restaurant against an individual has caught the attention of many due to its dramatic circumstances. The VIG Chicago, LLC lodged a lawsuit in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois on April 29, 2025, accusing Michael M. Davis of negligence after a concealed firearm discharged at their establishment.

According to the complaint, the incident occurred in the early hours of July 3, 2022, when Davis allegedly brought a concealed firearm into The VIG, located at 1527 N. Wells St., despite clear signage prohibiting firearms on the premises as per Section 65(d) of the Illinois Firearm Concealed Carry Act. The firearm accidentally discharged from Davis' pants pocket while he was adjusting his clothing, causing a bullet to ricochet off the floor and injure another patron. This incident led to administrative proceedings against The VIG by the City of Chicago, resulting in significant legal expenses for the establishment.

The VIG's legal team argues that Davis violated several duties under Illinois law. As an Illinois Concealed Carry License holder, Davis was required to comply with all provisions of the Firearm Concealed Carry Act (430 ILCS 66/ et seq.), including not carrying a firearm into establishments serving alcohol and ensuring it was securely fastened and safe from accidental discharge. The complaint highlights that Davis consumed alcohol while at The VIG and did not have his firearm properly secured or its safety engaged.

In response to this incident, The VIG claims they have suffered extensive damages including financial costs exceeding $83,260 due to legal defenses against municipal violations related to their liquor license. Additionally, they assert reputational harm as community concerns about safety led to decreased sales and employee turnover. To mitigate future risks, The VIG invested in enhanced security measures such as hiring armed security personnel and purchasing metal detectors.

The plaintiff seeks judgment for damages exceeding $50,000 along with litigation costs and other associated expenses. They are also requesting pre- and post-judgment interest on these amounts. Representing The VIG are attorneys Todd A. Rowden, James L. Oakley, and Carly Chocron from Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP.

This case is presided over by Judge Mariyana T. Spyropoulos under Case ID 2025L005649.

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

More News