Keogh Law Ltd.
Professional Services; Law |
Law Firms
55 W Monroe Street, Chicago, IL 60603-1423
Recent News About Keogh Law Ltd.
-
A class action lawsuit accuses furniture retailer Ikea of printing expiration debts for customer credit and debit cards on receipts, allegedly in violation of a federal law
-
Walgreens has won the chance to ask the state high court to decide if plaintiffs' lawyers can press big money class actions in Illinois state courts under a federal identity protection law, despite no harm caused by a technical violation of the law, and despite rulings across the country that they can't do so
-
Facial recognition firm Clarifai said it doesn't do business in or target Illinois, meaning the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act shouldn't apply to its actions.
-
A class action lawsuit against Illinois-based lunchmeat manufacturer Carl Buddig and Company for allegedly violating the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act was filed in the Cook County Circuit Court earlier this month.
-
Seventh Circuit Appeals Court in Chicago says some automated dialers acceptable under federal law if they only dial numbers stored in customer databases.
-
Complaint asks for court to order Clarifai to 'disgorge profits' earned from alleged illegal photo scans
-
A Chicago blood test laboratory has been pricked by a class action lawsuit, accusing it of violating an Illinois state privacy law in the way it required its workers to scan fingerprints when punching in and out of work shifts.
-
A tenant has filed a class action lawsuit against Stonebridge of Arlington Heights and The Connor Group, alleging a violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud & Deceptive Business Practices Act and other alleged illegal activities.
-
A federal judge has broken up a class action accusing Yahoo of sending text messages in violation of federal law, saying information provided after he certified the class indicated perhaps tens of thousands of class members may have actually consented to receive the texts when they signed up for Yahoo’s services.
-
Saying he understands many of his colleagues have ruled differently, a federal judge in Chicago has denied an attempt by a group of pet adopters to turn their legal beef into a class action against a pet health insurance provider, saying the company did not “harm” the new pet owners by calling to urge them to take advantage of a “gift” of 30-day free health insurance for their new pet, which the new owners had been told was included with the adoption of their animal.
-
A Chicago federal judge has refused to dismiss a suit, brought by a woman against a debt collection company, ruling the woman could have suffered a “concrete” harm when the company allegedly violated the federal Telephone Consumers Protection Act, by repeatedly phoning her after she told them to stop.
-
A man who claimed someone had fraudulently run up more than $2,500 in debt on a credit card opened in his name without his knowledge has secured another chance to press a lawsuit against a suburban debt collection agency, after a state appeals panel found the agency may have broken federal debt collection laws by suing the man over the contested debt after the statute of limitations had expired.
-
A tenant in a luxury apartment building on the north end of the Loop believes he and his fellow tenants are owed some free rent from their landlord, who is alleged in a new lawsuit to have violated city ordinance by not providing enough warning when sending work crews into tenants’ apartments when they weren’t home. On Sept. 10, Joshua Stahl, a resident of the 73 East Lake apartment building, filed suit in Cook County Circuit Court against RMK Management.
-
Litigation over Yahoo! Inc.'s text messaging service will move forward after a federal judge denied the Internet giant's motion for summary judgment.
-
An objection to a request for $22.5 million in attorney’s fees in what is believed to be the largest settlement in the history of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act has produced a discovery battle in Chicago’s federal court.
-
HoldermanA federal judge late last month gave a preliminary thumbs-up to what is being dubbed the largest settlement in the two decade-plus history of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.If the agreement receives the judge’s final stamp of approval in December, Capital One and a trio of collection agencies will have to put nearly $75.5 million into a fund to settle a combined class action suit over
